public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/55115] [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55115-4-Ib7471pkti@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55115-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Igor.Smirnov at cern dot ch
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 46444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-461791-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Sep 14 15:31:31 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-461791-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13919 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2014 15:31:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13848 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2014 15:31:24 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/46444] termination of preprocessing by cpp when no include file is found
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.5
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-46444-4-JnPkHHCFCz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46444-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46444-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01625.txt.bz2
Content-length: 657
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46444
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There are many work-arounds to achieve what you want to do.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55115 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-461792-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Sep 14 15:33:45 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-461792-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16380 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2014 15:33:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16354 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2014 15:33:41 -0000
From: "fabien at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60894] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Use of redundant struct keyword in function prototype combined with using statement causes compilation error
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60894-4-mowFWQ45RJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01626.txt.bz2
Content-length: 599
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id`894
--- Comment #9 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8)
> (In reply to fabien from comment #6)
> > I looked into it but did not manage to get it fixed. I will have another try
> > this week. Thanks for the reminder.
>
> Ping?
I have a patch for it, but not perfect as it triggers a minor diagnostic
regression about class-type redefinition in presence of using decl at class
scope. The using decl is no longer mentioned in the diagnostic... I'll try to
make it work, otherwise I would ask you some help...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-14 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-29 11:59 [Bug preprocessor/55115] New: " pierre.poissinger at gmail dot com
2012-10-29 12:54 ` [Bug preprocessor/55115] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-29 14:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-29 14:43 ` pierre.poissinger at gmail dot com
2012-10-29 14:47 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-29 14:54 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-29 14:55 ` pierre.poissinger at gmail dot com
2012-10-29 15:00 ` pierre.poissinger at gmail dot com
2012-10-29 15:03 ` pierre.poissinger at gmail dot com
2012-10-29 15:13 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-29 15:24 ` pierre.poissinger at gmail dot com
2012-10-31 22:46 ` pierre.poissinger at gmail dot com
2014-09-14 15:31 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-02-09 0:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 11:05 ` [Bug preprocessor/55115] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:14 ` [Bug preprocessor/55115] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:03 ` [Bug preprocessor/55115] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-01 14:48 ` Robert.Gomes at igt dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-55115-4-Ib7471pkti@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).