From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13906 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2014 15:31:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13875 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2014 15:31:26 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/55115] [>=4.5.0 regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01624.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D55115 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Igor.Smirnov at cern dot ch --- Comment #12 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- *** Bug 46444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** >>From gcc-bugs-return-461791-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Sep 14 15:31:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13919 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2014 15:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13848 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2014 15:31:24 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/46444] termination of preprocessing by cpp when no include file is found Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01625.txt.bz2 Content-length: 657 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D46444 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- There are many work-arounds to achieve what you want to do. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55115 *** >>From gcc-bugs-return-461792-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Sep 14 15:33:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16380 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2014 15:33:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16354 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2014 15:33:41 -0000 From: "fabien at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/60894] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Use of redundant struct keyword in function prototype combined with using statement causes compilation error Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fabien at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fabien at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01626.txt.bz2 Content-length: 599 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894 --- Comment #9 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8) > (In reply to fabien from comment #6) > > I looked into it but did not manage to get it fixed. I will have another try > > this week. Thanks for the reminder. > > Ping? I have a patch for it, but not perfect as it triggers a minor diagnostic regression about class-type redefinition in presence of using decl at class scope. The using decl is no longer mentioned in the diagnostic... I'll try to make it work, otherwise I would ask you some help...