From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22324 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2015 11:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22048 invoked by uid 48); 9 Apr 2015 11:05:05 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/55115] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority bug_status cf_known_to_work keywords cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed short_desc target_milestone cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00669.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work| |4.4.5 Keywords| |diagnostic Last reconfirmed|2012-10-29 00:00:00 |2015-04-09 CC| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[>=4.5.0 regression] |[4.8/4.9/5 Regression] |missing headers as fatal |missing headers as fatal |breaks cproto logic |breaks cproto logic Target Milestone|--- |4.8.5 Known to fail| |4.5.0, 5.0 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Caused by r145341 aka fix for PR15638, confirmed. This was a deliberate change, but not for -E (well, you'd have different behavior for -save-temps ...). We should either close this as WONTFIX or fix it ;)