From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12151 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2013 16:20:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 11906 invoked by uid 55); 1 Mar 2013 16:19:47 -0000 From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/55135] [4.8 Regression] Segfault of gcc on a big file Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at ucw dot cz X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-01 16:19:47 UTC --- > I will take care of the early inlining problem. I wonder, you don't have oprofile of that, by any chance? Aha, callee walking in update_inline_summary. Perhaps I will really need to make this incremental despite the risk of accmulating roundoff errors.. I will play with this a bit more. Honza