From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32502 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2012 14:31:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 32454 invoked by uid 48); 7 Nov 2012 14:30:49 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55139] __atomic store does not support __ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00603.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-07 14:30:49 UTC --- What compiler compiled the code? Older g++s would optimize it away, but newer ones should have -fno-strict-enums by default. That said, guess it would be better to rewrite it to use int anyway.