From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20180 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2012 14:06:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 20078 invoked by uid 48); 9 Nov 2012 14:06:21 -0000 From: "andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55139] __atomic store does not support __ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00829.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139 --- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen 2012-11-09 14:06:20 UTC --- My earlier analysis was not correct. I was chasing the wrong warning. Rather the problem is in c-common.c, where the atomic models are checked again. I'm sending a patch for that.