From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20201 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2012 14:15:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 19736 invoked by uid 48); 5 Nov 2012 14:15:16 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55175] i386/sfp-exceptions.c:52:7: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00367.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175 --- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-05 14:15:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > > You should use t-softfp instead of 386/t-softfp for i[34567]86-*-rtems* in > > libgcc/config.host. > > > > In fact, there should be no i386/t-softfp for any x86 target. > > You mean, we should apply a patch similar to this? Yes. > The breakdown above is with this patch applied. Then the problem is either in newlib or generic libgcc configury. Anyway, original problem with soft-fp was fixed.