From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-405524-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30167 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2012 21:59:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 30103 invoked by uid 48); 2 Nov 2012 21:59:28 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/55177] missed optimizations with __builtin_bswap
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55177-4-K88m3qZu6F@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55177-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55177-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177

--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-02 21:59:27 UTC ---
> So what you describe as 'really dumb' is actually something that we *force*
> people to do. We'd be much worse off without it.

'really dumb' applied only to the example though, not to your design decisions
which are probably reasonable, even if they yield these useless byte-swapping
primitives in some cases.