public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0
@ 2012-11-04 12:14 zsojka at seznam dot cz
2012-11-04 13:18 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: zsojka at seznam dot cz @ 2012-11-04 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204
Bug #: 55204
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140
(unrecognizable insn) with -O --param
loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: zsojka@seznam.cz
Created attachment 28610
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28610
reduced testcase
Compiler output:
$ gcc -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0 testcase.ctestcase.c: In
function 'f1':
testcase.c:18:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
}
^
(insn 53 50 24 5 (set (reg:SI 5 di [77])
(plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg:HI 7 sp) 0)
(const_int -248 [0xffffffffffffff08]))) testcase.c:13 -1
(nil))
testcase.c:18:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140
0x9969ea _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char
const*)
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/gcc/rtl-error.c:110
0x996a7a _fatal_insn_not_found(rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*)
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/gcc/rtl-error.c:118
0x9524d8 extract_insn(rtx_def*)
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.c:2140
0x9526eb extract_insn_cached(rtx_def*)
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.c:2043
0x79f91d cleanup_subreg_operands(rtx_def*)
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/gcc/final.c:2968
0x94dc60 split_insn
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.c:2857
0x956401 split_all_insns()
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.c:2911
0x956558 rest_of_handle_split_after_reload
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.c:3795
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Tested revisions:
r193125 - crash
r192654 - OK
r191586 - OK
4.7 r191640 - OK
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0
2012-11-04 12:14 [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0 zsojka at seznam dot cz
@ 2012-11-04 13:18 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-04 20:07 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-04 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-11-04
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot
| |gnu.org, rsandifo at gcc
| |dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-04 13:18:17 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=192988
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0
2012-11-04 12:14 [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0 zsojka at seznam dot cz
2012-11-04 13:18 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-04 20:07 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-05 9:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-04 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204
rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0
2012-11-04 12:14 [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0 zsojka at seznam dot cz
2012-11-04 13:18 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-04 20:07 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-05 9:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-11-05 18:52 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2012-11-05 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-11-05 09:21:57 UTC ---
Does the patch at [1] fix also this failure?
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg00353.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0
2012-11-04 12:14 [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0 zsojka at seznam dot cz
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-05 9:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2012-11-05 18:52 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-05 18:55 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-05 18:59 ` [Bug target/55204] " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-05 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-05 18:51:40 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Nov 5 18:51:33 2012
New Revision: 193178
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193178
Log:
gcc/
PR target/55204
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_address_subreg_operand): Remove stack
pointer check.
(print_reg): Use true_regnum rather than REGNO.
(ix86_print_operand_address): Remove SUBREG handling.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0
2012-11-04 12:14 [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0 zsojka at seznam dot cz
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-05 18:52 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-05 18:55 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-05 18:59 ` [Bug target/55204] " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-05 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-05 18:55:38 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Nov 5 18:55:35 2012
New Revision: 193179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193179
Log:
gcc/
PR target/55204
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_address_subreg_operand): Remove stack
pointer check.
(print_reg): Use true_regnum rather than REGNO.
(ix86_print_operand_address): Remove SUBREG handling.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/55204] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0
2012-11-04 12:14 [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0 zsojka at seznam dot cz
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-05 18:55 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-11-05 18:59 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-05 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55204
rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimization |target
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-05 18:59:12 UTC ---
Patch applied.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-05 18:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-04 12:14 [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2140 (unrecognizable insn) with -O --param loop-invariant-max-bbs-in-loop=0 zsojka at seznam dot cz
2012-11-04 13:18 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/55204] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-04 20:07 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-05 9:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-11-05 18:52 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-05 18:55 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-05 18:59 ` [Bug target/55204] " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).