From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8FF503858C5F; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:50:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8FF503858C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1726800642;
	bh=lkHpKUgWR2kSYIV3s/MtZjg/t9647yKOHq+7+fV0f5o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=O6pCMGgj+eTT9yTfDJpRF8Mn64lbZt1QW593GVHDogHVlUJbVOWg88XltZGvlJ9DJ
	 Dq6IextrJlDXp2aHdqeyNZXeSp9UGs8yQSK9sLJ5mdD5FNy2dZHvuidtOaxcaicVVB
	 2J32YVb85yJU+79+tdwx/DBEnYcWpvk7T1qQyABU=
From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:50:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-55212-4-5DlV9QpzwK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D55212

--- Comment #278 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #277)
> Created attachment 59153 [details]
> [lra] take scratch as implicit unused output reloads
>=20
> > * call_pcrel patterns: match_scratch can cause ICE for the corner case.=
  We use a fixed register instead of scratch as a quick fix.  More investig=
ation is needed.
>=20
> This sounds familiar.  I may have an LRA patch to address this problem, b=
ut
> it's got very little testing.

Thanks!  I'll give it a try.=