From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4930A3858C66; Tue,  3 Sep 2024 05:34:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4930A3858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1725341652;
	bh=f3sHlKv2Px0cVNkmVtY/G+z8Qdo4dhAC6kPeJqyF8iA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=V0T0z0wGaRyH+4axM6KJfuBH+fuEkoeNM42kYDQ+Z267ot4w9DT4o+237cMrWNn8X
	 MyA7PyLAaOhYqDwKH5x0lIgEYDR6HFANIYY6EzGY+o0rih2KajcrN+kMHeKS64JR/S
	 A6bmeYLIMEfG2UE/jfxE0PFmy4W1kceHOaYQPSHI=
From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 05:34:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-55212-4-Nx8EmWCWXa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D55212

--- Comment #225 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-=
berlin.de> ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #224)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #223)
> >=20
> > I had run into some issues with my build environment, so my results are=
 a
> > little delayed. Apologies.
>=20
> No problem.
>=20
> After further testing, it appears that there may be some wrong code issue=
.=20
> Not sure if this is due to the patch 59034 or not, but I'm looking into i=
t.=20
> So there is no hurry to do the bootstrap test in your environment.  I will
> report back once the problem is clear.

It seems that I have run into this issue after 59034 as well since the comp=
iler
segfaults for me with the patch applied:

/srv/glaubitz/gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/srv/glaubitz/gcc/build/./gcc/
-fno-checking -xc -nostdinc /dev/null -S -o /dev/null
-fself-test=3D../../gcc/testsuite/selftests
cc1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x2b7a0f9f __libc_start_call_main
        ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
0x2b7a1083 __libc_start_main_impl
        ./csu/libc-start.c:360
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.=