From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-496959-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 104710 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2015 11:58:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104639 invoked by uid 48); 11 Sep 2015 11:58:31 -0000
From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55212-4-jmrCIE5Rf7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00937.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212

--- Comment #95 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #94)
> Kaz, do you think we can enable LRA by default for GCC 6?

I think that it's OK to make LRA default on trunk, even if it's
better with your R0 pre-allocating pass.
The last time I tested -mlra, there are some regressions, though.
I'd like to test it again.  Could you see any serious problems on
sh-elf with -mlra?