public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/55214] New: Program fail to evaluate where clause
@ 2012-11-05 13:58 pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
2012-11-05 14:03 ` [Bug fortran/55214] " pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com @ 2012-11-05 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214
Bug #: 55214
Summary: Program fail to evaluate where clause
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: pmarguinaud@hotmail.com
LOGICAL :: L (2)
REAL :: X (2), Y (2)
L (1) = .TRUE.
L (2) = .FALSE.
X (1) = +1
X (2) = -1
Y = 0.
WHERE (L)
WHERE (SQRT(X)>0)
Y = 1.
END WHERE
END WHERE
PRINT *, Y
END
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/55214] Program fail to evaluate where clause
2012-11-05 13:58 [Bug fortran/55214] New: Program fail to evaluate where clause pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
@ 2012-11-05 14:03 ` pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
2012-11-05 14:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-18 4:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com @ 2012-11-05 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214
--- Comment #1 from pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com 2012-11-05 14:03:32 UTC ---
$ gfortran -g -O0 -ffpe-trap=invalid -static where.F90
$ ./a.out
Program received signal SIGFPE: Floating-point exception - erroneous arithmetic
operation.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x40FBFD in _gfortrani_show_backtrace at backtrace.c:260
#1 0x400676 in _gfortrani_backtrace_handler at compile_options.c:129
#2 0x42996F in raise
#3 0x4004C7 in MAIN__ at where.F90:10
Exception en point flottant
Tested with gfortran 4.6.1 and latest 4.7; it looks like SQRT(X) is evaluated
where L is false.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/55214] Program fail to evaluate where clause
2012-11-05 13:58 [Bug fortran/55214] New: Program fail to evaluate where clause pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
2012-11-05 14:03 ` [Bug fortran/55214] " pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
@ 2012-11-05 14:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-18 4:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-05 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-11-05
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-05 14:56:56 UTC ---
Confirmed - and not a regression as it also fails with GCC 4.1.
>From the C-like dump file (use -fdump-tree-original to create it):
For WHERE (L), one has:
cond.3 = (logical(kind=1)) l[S.2 + -1];
temp.0[count.1] = cond.3;
Which is then used in WHERE (SQRT(X)>0):
cond.7 = __builtin_sqrtf (x[S.6 + -1]) > 0.0;
mask.8 = temp.0[count.5];
temp.4[count.5] = mask.8 && cond.7;
The proper way would be:
mask.8 = temp.0[count.5];
temp.4[count.5] = mask.8 ? __builtin_sqrtf (x[S.6 + -1]) > 0.0 : mask.8;
That is, the condition only gets evaluated if the outer mask is true.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/55214] Program fail to evaluate where clause
2012-11-05 13:58 [Bug fortran/55214] New: Program fail to evaluate where clause pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
2012-11-05 14:03 ` [Bug fortran/55214] " pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
2012-11-05 14:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-18 4:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-18 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 64097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-18 4:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-05 13:58 [Bug fortran/55214] New: Program fail to evaluate where clause pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
2012-11-05 14:03 ` [Bug fortran/55214] " pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com
2012-11-05 14:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-18 4:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).