public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "wjwray at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55227] designated initializer for char array by string constant
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:54:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55227-4-52Mzy64DoX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227

Will Wray <wjwray at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wjwray at gmail dot com

--- Comment #6 from Will Wray <wjwray at gmail dot com> ---
Hit this in implementing P1997 array copy semantics (which generalizes
the char-array <- string-literal case to array <- array initialization).

Compiler Explorer link https://godbolt.org/z/vednE3bYz

The reshape_init_r code that ensadc points to is one problem.
The code effectively special-cases the C rule that allows optional
braces around a string-literal initializer:

  A brace-enclosed string-literal initializer has its braces stripped,
  but then the code does not account at all for nested designators
  (as a recursive call to reshape_init would or should do).

This can be seen in the way that bogus nested designators are ignored:

    struct C {char a[2];}

    C y = {{.bogus="y"}}; // Invalid, g++ accepts
    C z = {{[0]="z"}};    // Invalid, g++ accepts (pedantic warning GNU [0])

(so the 'solution' of adding braces is misleading, non-standard, non-portable).

Then, in placing the designator correctly outside the braces, it is not
matched with the brace-enclosed initializer (haven't tracked down why yet):

    C w = {.a={"w"}};  // Valid, g++ rejects designated braced
                       // (gcc C accepts) (other C++ compilers accept)

A second problem is that the 'matching' of designator to initializer is
brittle even without optional braces; only the exactly-matching char-array
type (i.e. and extent) is accepted in an unbraced string literal:

    C u = {.a="u"}; // Valid, designated char[2] literal for char[2] field
    C r = {.a=""};  // Valid, g++ rejects designated char[1] for char[2]

A workaround is to match the size of the char array by padding with zeros:

    C r = {.a="\0"};

I've spent over a day trying to isolate the 'matching' issue -
could do with assist from a designated-initializer mechanic.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-24 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-07  8:27 [Bug c++/55227] New: " pavel.v.chupin at gmail dot com
2012-11-07 22:25 ` [Bug c++/55227] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2020-04-08 10:11 ` ensadc at mailnesia dot com
2020-06-16 11:40 ` steven.spark at gmail dot com
2021-10-24 15:54 ` wjwray at gmail dot com [this message]
2021-10-24 21:25 ` wjwray at gmail dot com
2021-10-24 21:31 ` wjwray at gmail dot com
2021-10-25 17:06 ` wjwray at gmail dot com
2021-10-25 17:44 ` wjwray at gmail dot com
2021-11-04 23:43 ` wjwray at gmail dot com
2021-11-07  0:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-18  3:17 ` wjwray at gmail dot com
2021-11-18  3:21 ` wjwray at gmail dot com
2021-12-14  5:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-23 22:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55227-4-52Mzy64DoX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).