public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/55234] New: module procedure potential syntax error within interface block
@ 2012-11-07 15:39 valeryweber at hotmail dot com
2012-11-07 16:46 ` [Bug fortran/55234] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: valeryweber at hotmail dot com @ 2012-11-07 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55234
Bug #: 55234
Summary: module procedure potential syntax error within
interface block
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: valeryweber@hotmail.com
Dear All
I wonder if the "::" is not a syntax error in the following interface block?
While gfortran goes through, other compilers like xlf or pgf90 complain about
it.
gcc version 4.8.0 20121107 (experimental) (GCC)
module mod
interface foo
module procedure :: foo1
end interface
contains
subroutine foo1 ( )
end subroutine foo1
end module mod
Valery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/55234] module procedure potential syntax error within interface block
2012-11-07 15:39 [Bug fortran/55234] New: module procedure potential syntax error within interface block valeryweber at hotmail dot com
@ 2012-11-07 16:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-07 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55234
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 16:46:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I wonder if the "::" is not a syntax error in the following interface block?
No, this is certainly valid in Fortran 2008:
R1206 procedure-stmt is [ MODULE ] PROCEDURE [ :: ] procedure-name-list
So, the "::" is allowed, but optional. Note that it is not allowed according to
Fortran 2003, so gfortran will reject it with -std=f2003.
> While gfortran goes through, other compilers like xlf or pgf90 complain about
> it.
You should submit a bugreport to those guys instead ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-07 16:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-07 15:39 [Bug fortran/55234] New: module procedure potential syntax error within interface block valeryweber at hotmail dot com
2012-11-07 16:46 ` [Bug fortran/55234] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).