[Bug fortran/55234] New: module procedure potential syntax error within interface block

[Bug fortran/55234] New: module procedure potential syntax error within interface block

[valeryweber at hotmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55234

             Bug #: 55234
           Summary: module procedure potential syntax error within
                    interface block
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: valeryweber@hotmail.com


Dear All

I wonder if the "::" is not a syntax error in the following interface block?
While gfortran goes through, other compilers like xlf or pgf90 complain about
it.

gcc version 4.8.0 20121107 (experimental) (GCC) 

module mod
  interface foo
     module procedure :: foo1
  end interface
contains
  subroutine foo1 ( )
  end subroutine foo1
end module mod

Valery

[Bug fortran/55234] module procedure potential syntax error within interface block

[janus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55234

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 16:46:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I wonder if the "::" is not a syntax error in the following interface block?

No, this is certainly valid in Fortran 2008:

R1206 procedure-stmt is [ MODULE ] PROCEDURE [ :: ] procedure-name-list

So, the "::" is allowed, but optional. Note that it is not allowed according to
Fortran 2003, so gfortran will reject it with -std=f2003.



> While gfortran goes through, other compilers like xlf or pgf90 complain about
> it.

You should submit a bugreport to those guys instead ...