From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-409860-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6412 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2012 18:26:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 5874 invoked by uid 48); 14 Dec 2012 18:26:09 -0000
From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55243-4-0RqtLpog5O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01468.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243

--- Comment #25 from Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-14 18:26:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 28960
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28960
Don't use STAMP to please Ada

(In reply to comment #24)
> > What I don't understand is what is bad with Rolf's proposal of defining STAMP?
> 
> We simply don't need to stamp anything for the gnattools.

Notice $(srcdir)/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in reads:

# target overrides
ifneq ($(tmake_file),)
include $(tmake_file)
endif

# host overrides
ifneq ($(xmake_file),)
include $(xmake_file)
endif

There are other backends like x86 and mips that use STAMP in their t-snip, so I
wonder how you can conclude that ada does not include code that might require
STAMP?

Here is a patch that bypasses the need of STAMP in t-avr.  Rolf can test it.


    PR55243
    * config/avr/t-avr: Don't automatically rebuild
    $(srcdir)/config/avr/t-multilib
    $(srcdir)/config/avr/avr-tables.opt
    $(srcdir)/doc/avr-mmcu.texi
    (avr-mcus): New phony target to build them on request.
    (s-avr-mlib, s-avr-mmcu-texi): Remove.
    * avr/avr-mcus.def: Adjust comments.