From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4974 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2012 23:13:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 4889 invoked by uid 48); 10 Dec 2012 23:13:09 -0000 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01049.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-10 23:13:05 UTC --- > As far as gnattools are concerned, it makes no difference whether the > auto-generated files are stamped and written to $build or stamped and written > to $source. > > I agree that the $source vs. $build matter should be cleaned up. > > However, that won't help with this PR because the rules and the dependencies > and the needed tools will remain the same. So we're back to square one: why on Earth does this file need to be regenerated when the gnattools are built, since it has already been generated previously during the build (in addition to being already present in the source tree)?