From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17368 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2012 01:44:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 17334 invoked by uid 48); 9 Nov 2012 01:44:05 -0000 From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55246] New: Define a macro for 16*1024*1024 Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00795.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55246 Bug #: 55246 Summary: Define a macro for 16*1024*1024 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com CC: ubizjak@gmail.com i386 backend has i386.c: || INTVAL (op1) >= 16*1024*1024 i386.c: || INTVAL (op1) < -16*1024*1024) i386.c: if (INTVAL (op1) < -16*1024*1024 i386.c: || INTVAL (op1) >= 16*1024*1024) predicates.md: && offset < 16*1024*1024 predicates.md: && offset < 16*1024*1024 It is a magic number for 64-bit displacement. We should define a macro to make it consistent.