From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-406236-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24802 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2012 09:15:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 24756 invoked by uid 48); 10 Nov 2012 09:15:33 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 09:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55247-4-53BDE9EDx7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55247-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55247-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00898.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247

--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-11-10 09:15:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (define_insn "*movti_internal_rex64"
>   [(set (match_operand:TI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=!r ,!o  ,x,x ,m")
>         (match_operand:TI 1 "general_operand"      "riFo,riF,C,xm,x"))]
>   "TARGET_64BIT && !(MEM_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1]))"
> 
> Uros, is this change ok for you?  If it is ok I can commit the patch only on
> Wednesday (I'll be away for a few days).

Yes, the change looks correct to me. I'll take care of the patch.