From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19727 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2013 21:33:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19601 invoked by uid 48); 1 Nov 2013 21:32:59 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/55252] Caret diagnostic doesn't show useful location when macro clashes with name in system header Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D55252 --- Comment #12 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- PR52962 is another case where it would make more sense to give the error on= the macro expansion location rather than on the macro definition. >>From gcc-bugs-return-433292-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 21:40:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28138 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2013 21:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27951 invoked by uid 48); 1 Nov 2013 21:40:24 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/43736] Invalid uninitialized variable warning at -O3 -Wall Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 Content-length: 561 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D43736 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- This seems to be fixed on 4.9. >>From gcc-bugs-return-433293-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 21:45:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1193 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2013 21:45:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1167 invoked by uid 48); 1 Nov 2013 21:45:15 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/44781] unjustified warning about uninitialized variable Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 Content-length: 617 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D44781 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- It seems fixed since 4.6 and the testcase is too large to be useful for the testsuite. >>From gcc-bugs-return-433294-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 21:46:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2661 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2013 21:46:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2594 invoked by uid 55); 1 Nov 2013 21:46:56 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/48326] Target attribute leaks from function pointers Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 Content-length: 800 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, michael at talamasca dot ocis.net wrote: > Do I have to file a separate bug report in order to fix the problem that > current GCC releases can't be expected to bootstrap up if the starting compiler > is GCC 4.7.0 (among several other problem releases) and the host hardware is > ix86 with no cmov? Please do. Such a bug report would be a request for libcpp to work around known buggy bootstrap compilers, which is completely separate from the present report about the actual bug in those compilers. (Or test and send to gcc-patches a patch with the change you suggest; a one-line fix like that doesn't need a copyright assignment.)