public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "david at doublewise dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55254] New: Warn for implicit conversion from int to char
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55254-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55254

             Bug #: 55254
           Summary: Warn for implicit conversion from int to char
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: david@doublewise.net


I sometimes want to construct a string with n copies of a char c. However, I
frequently get the order of elements in the constructor mixed up. Rather than
saying std::string(80, '='), I accidentally call std::string('=', 80).

To me, it seems like the underlying issue here is that gcc does not warn for
implicit conversion from int to char. Whenever I assign a literal to a char, I
always assign something wrapped in single quotes, never an integer literal.

However, I would suggest that perhaps this warning should have two levels. The
first level would only warn for char. The second level would warn for char,
signed char, and unsigned char. The reason for this separation is that int8_t
is a typedef for signed char and uint8_t is a typedef for unsigned char (on
most platforms), and those are regularly used as "small integers" (I use them
extensively in space-sensitive code). My experience is that when people use a
signed / unsigned char explicitly, or one of the typedefs in cstdint /
stdint.h, they are not used as actual characters, but bytes / small numbers,
and in that case, assigning from an integer wouldn't be incorrect.


             reply	other threads:[~2012-11-09 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-09 18:29 david at doublewise dot net [this message]
2012-11-14 17:12 ` [Bug c++/55254] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-09  1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55254-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).