public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/55275] New: abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates @ 2012-11-11 20:28 redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 17:29 ` [Bug c++/55275] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-11 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 Bug #: 55275 Summary: abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: redi@gcc.gnu.org CC: jason@gcc.gnu.org This doesn't compile: template<typename T> struct __attribute ((abi_tag("cxx11"))) Foo { int f(); }; template<> struct __attribute ((abi_tag("cxx11"))) Foo<int> { int f(); }; int main() { Foo<int> f; f.f(); } abi.cc:10:1: error: redeclaration of ‘struct Foo<int>’ adds abi tag "cxx11" Foo<int> ^ abi.cc:2:41: note: previous declaration here struct __attribute ((abi_tag("cxx11"))) Foo ^ If I remove the attribute from the specialization then it compiles but the name of the specialization doesn't include the abi_tag: U _ZN3FooIiE1fEv I want to use this with std::future which has explicit specializations. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55275] abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates 2012-11-11 20:28 [Bug c++/55275] New: abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-12 17:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 18:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-12 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-11-12 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-12 17:28:59 UTC --- I agree this is a bug, but I still don't think you need to tag future, since it's new in C++11. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55275] abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates 2012-11-11 20:28 [Bug c++/55275] New: abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 17:29 ` [Bug c++/55275] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-12 18:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 1:54 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 14:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-12 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-12 18:04:53 UTC --- Yep, I filed this before your reply on the list. I'm happy to change <future> without using the tag, I was just being (maybe too) cautious about ABI changes. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55275] abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates 2012-11-11 20:28 [Bug c++/55275] New: abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 17:29 ` [Bug c++/55275] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 18:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 1:54 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 14:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-15 01:53:34 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 15 01:53:23 2012 New Revision: 193524 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193524 Log: PR c++/55275 * pt.c (maybe_process_partial_specialization): Update DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION for new specializations. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/abi-tag3.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr31439.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash98.C trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/type_traits/add_unsigned_integer_neg.cc trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/type_traits/remove_unsigned_integer_neg.cc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55275] abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates 2012-11-11 20:28 [Bug c++/55275] New: abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates redi at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2012-11-15 1:54 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 14:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-15 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-15 14:48:41 UTC --- Fixed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-15 14:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-11-11 20:28 [Bug c++/55275] New: abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 17:29 ` [Bug c++/55275] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 18:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 1:54 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 14:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).