From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13642 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 08:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 13518 invoked by uid 48); 15 Nov 2012 08:18:02 -0000 From: "glider at google dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: glider at google dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01375.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #39 from Alexander Potapenko 2012-11-15 08:18:01 UTC --- I agree with Kostya that no major changes to mach_override are necessary because we are really going to dump it. However minor fixes required for ASan in GCC to work on Darwin right now should be perfectly ok. As there currently are issues blocking the dynamic ASan runtime (e.g. https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=124), and we still depend on CoreFoundation I can't promise that we'll get rid of mach_override before the GCC 4.8 release.