From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-406825-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24087 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 11:42:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 24047 invoked by uid 48); 16 Nov 2012 11:41:50 -0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/55297] [4.8 Regression] type-bound operator clashes with abstract interface
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo
Message-ID: <bug-55297-4-eaIGtcbk0P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55297-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55297-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01487.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 11:41:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The question is whether it should be fixed by adding
>    if (derived->ns != gfc_current_ns)
>      return;

Yes, something along this line seems like the appropriate fix to me. In
particular I would propose the following (which does fix the test case):


Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c    (revision 193552)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c    (working copy)
@@ -11540,7 +11540,7 @@ resolve_typebound_intrinsic_op (gfc_symbol* derive

       /* Add target to non-typebound operator list.  */
       if (!target->specific->deferred && !derived->attr.use_assoc
-      && p->access != ACCESS_PRIVATE)
+      && p->access != ACCESS_PRIVATE && derived->ns == gfc_current_ns)
     {
       gfc_interface *head, *intr;
       if (gfc_check_new_interface (derived->ns->op[op], target_proc,


Will commit as obvious after regtesting ...