From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13120 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2013 11:32:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 13037 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2013 11:32:00 -0000 From: "kcc at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg02678.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 --- Comment #57 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-28 11:31:54 UTC --- I've created a page that describes how I run SPEC with asan. There is also a patch that works around the known SPEC bugs. https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/RunningSpecBenchmarks https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/trunk/spec/spec2006-asan.patch