From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22569 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2012 12:36:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 20162 invoked by uid 48); 14 Nov 2012 12:36:26 -0000 From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55317] [i386-regression] just don't strip stdcall suffix in gcc Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:36:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker X-Bugzilla-Who: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01238.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317 Kai Tietz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-14 12:36:25 UTC --- Yes, it is a duplicate *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55268 ***