From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7910 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2012 21:52:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 7863 invoked by uid 48); 14 Nov 2012 21:52:14 -0000 From: "3dw4rd at verizon dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/55325] [4.8 Regression]: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-complex.C excess errors Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: 3dw4rd at verizon dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01300.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325 --- Comment #6 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2012-11-14 21:52:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > > Invoke with gnu++0x: > // { dg-options -std=gnu++0x } > > Invoke with new flag: > // { dg-options -std=c++0x -fext-numeric-literals } > > I'll look at the other fails. Similarly for template23.C. We'll just set the correct flag in the testcase. I'm still looking at the errors in comment 3.