From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28459 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 02:40:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 27864 invoked by uid 48); 15 Nov 2012 02:39:59 -0000 From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/55325] [4.8 Regression]: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-complex.C excess errors Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 02:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01359.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325 --- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-15 02:39:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Excess errors: > > /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/gnu_fext-numeric-literals.C:94:3: > > ... > > maybe related, maybe material for a new PR. > > I'm not getting this on x86_64-linux at least. What target are you on? I guess it's no longer interesting seeing the later comments, in particular comment #10, but it's cris-axis-elf (obvious by elimination, see listed targets). Since TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX doesn't have a sane default, this part of the test should IMHO be parametrized by say an testsuite "effective-target". Or should the default for TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX changed to something sane? By "sane" I mean the mode for "long double", (i.e. DFmode by default) for 'q' and 'w'. (BTW, I hate that I can't grep for TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX in the sources and get sane results other than the target hits.)