From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1626 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 12:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 1526 invoked by uid 48); 16 Nov 2012 12:05:45 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01492.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-16 12:05:44 UTC --- Restrict is one thing, not figuring out that disjoint accesses to the same array don't overlap is another (i.e. the #c5 testcase). Cast restrict is hard to do reliably, as the referenced PR documents, while figuring out that say Creating dr for *_7 analyze_innermost: success. base_address: &mem offset from base address: 0 constant offset from base address: 4096 step: 4 aligned to: 128 base_object: *(const float *) &mem Access function 0: {4096B, +, 4}_1 and Creating dr for *_6 analyze_innermost: success. base_address: &mem offset from base address: 0 constant offset from base address: 0 step: 4 aligned to: 128 base_object: MEM[(float *)&mem] Access function 0: {0B, +, 4}_1 for 1024 iterations would be really nice.