public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55334-4-rXXNiGInh1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334

--- Comment #39 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vidya Praveen from comment #38)
> Until we fix this issue, could we have workaround posted by Martin Jambor
> (comment #29) applied again on 4.9 and trunk? 

No, not on trunk please.

As I said on IRC yesterday.  Before we even consider this for the 4.9
branch, please verify that inlining does not cause the same problems
with the benchmark (on the particular architecture you care for).  It
is certainly capable of doing that and we certainly do not want to
switch inlining off :-)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-03 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15  2:27 [Bug tree-optimization/55334] New: " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15  7:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] " vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-15 11:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-15 11:42 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 10:39 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 10:56 ` vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-16 12:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 13:20 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 13:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 13:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 13:46 ` vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-16 13:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 13:59 ` vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-16 14:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 14:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-07 10:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21 12:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21 13:49 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-12-21 14:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21 14:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21 14:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21 14:22 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-12-21 14:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-12 20:11 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-13  9:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-19 12:55 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-19 13:50 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2013-02-20 11:13 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-20 12:57 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-20 14:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-28 12:36 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-10 23:54 ` chris_s_jones at yahoo dot com
2013-07-24 15:47 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-25 16:33 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2014-04-22 11:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9/4.10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-02 15:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9/5 " vp at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-03 10:04 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-09-03 10:25 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2014-09-03 14:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-05 12:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 10:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24  9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24  9:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24  9:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16 11:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9 " andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot com
2015-02-16 11:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16 12:17 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-06-26 20:01 ` [Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55334-4-rXXNiGInh1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).