public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55341-4-7FQOTyS6q8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341

--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-19 08:52:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> For whatever reason the fortran code is touching asan's shadow:
>   Address 0x1ffff6742e2c is located in the high shadow area.
> 
> What is __qs_environment_MOD_qs_init doing? 
> Is it normally touching that region of address space?

Ah, it could be the clearing of the stack shadow area.  If there are just a few
stores needed or if it is non-contiguous enough,
          clear_storage (shadow_mem, GEN_INT (last_size >> ASAN_SHADOW_SHIFT),
                         BLOCK_OP_NORMAL);
is expanded as piece-wise stores, but if the shadow memory area is too big,
depending on the target CPU it can be also expanded as memset function call.

So, to fix this, either libasan should for memset ignore any diagnostics for
stores into shadow memory area, or I'll need to force somehow that memset is
never generated for it, or we could have a non-instrumented memset alternative
in libasan and we could call that.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-19  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 13:18 [Bug fortran/55341] New: " Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-11-15 14:03 ` [Bug fortran/55341] " Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-11-16 10:28 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 10:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 10:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-17 12:16 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-17 13:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 12:37 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-10 12:45 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 13:19 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-10 13:21 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 13:26 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-10 13:28 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 13:33 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-10 13:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-10 13:56 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19  8:17 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19  8:37 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19  8:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19  8:49 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19  8:52 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19  8:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-12-19  8:59 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19  9:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19  9:06 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 10:32 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19 14:10 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 14:29 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19 14:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19 14:36 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 15:57 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 16:08 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 18:01 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 20:59 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-12-20 16:15 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-20 16:42 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-12-20 17:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-12-20 17:42 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-12-20 17:50 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-12-21  8:02 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-21  8:04 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-21  8:11 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-21  8:19 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-21  8:23 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-22 20:54 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-23  7:44 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-23 19:45 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-24 11:54 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-01-08 17:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-08 17:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-08 17:26 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55341-4-7FQOTyS6q8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).