From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25896 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2013 18:53:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 25851 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jan 2013 18:53:26 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:53:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Priority CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg02599.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P1 |P2 CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-28 18:53:25 UTC --- I'm downgrading this to P2, it is unfortunate we generate slightly worse code on this testcase, but it is more important how LRA vs. reload behaves on average on various benchmarks etc. This doesn't mean this isn't important to look at, but I think it isn't a release blocker at this point.