public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55354-4-daS598fzqK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354

--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-21 09:23:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> What I see is that it also affect code generation (register allocation). Do we
> need to file a bug on that?

If you see a code generation difference even with -ftls-model=local-exec -fPIC
vs. -fPIE, then it must mean you don't have visibility attributes on the
symbols used in the fast path.  For initial-exec, the RA effects should be
minimal, the TLS offset load from got is usually very close to the actual TLS
memory load (or lea), and thus it will just pick up some short lived scratch
register.  Generally in GCC, -fPIE sets flag_pic and not flag_shlib, while
-fPIC sets flag_pic and flag_shlib.  flag_pic is about whether position
independent code needs to be generated, flag_shlib is about whether locally
defined symbols can be interposed (plus it affects TLS model default choice).

> For dynamic libraries that are loaded into a non-instrumented executable (e.g.
> swig so preloaded into python process), we statically link the tsan runtime
> into the so.

And you don't get linker errors from that?  That must be by pure luck.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-21  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-16 17:03 [Bug other/55354] New: " konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-16 17:15 ` [Bug other/55354] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 17:21 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2012-11-16 17:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 20:28 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-16 20:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-16 20:54 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-17 20:36 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-11-17 21:08 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-11-18 19:36 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-18 19:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-18 19:59 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-18 20:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-19  4:13 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-19  8:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-19  9:03 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-19  9:06 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-19 10:53 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2012-11-21  7:45 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2012-11-21  8:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-21  9:06 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2012-11-21  9:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-11-23  7:17 ` [Bug sanitizer/55354] " dvyukov at google dot com
2012-11-23  7:28 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2012-11-23  8:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-23  8:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-23  8:36 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2012-11-23 10:47 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-23 11:16 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55354-4-daS598fzqK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).