public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/55376] [asan] libsanitizer/README.gcc must contain the exact steps to do code changes and to port code from upstream
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55376-4-limc4iMAg2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55376-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376

--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-20 07:23:26 UTC ---
> === 
> All changes in this directory should be pre-approved by one of the maintainers.
> Trivial and urgent fixes (portability, build fixes, etc) may go directly to the
> gcc tree. All non-trivial changes, functionality improvements, etc should go
> through the upstream tree first and then be merged back to the gcc tree. 
> 
> === 

The first sentence is odd, since all changes must already be approved as per
the GCC rules, but the rest is reasonable.  And it's GCC, not gcc, like LLVM.

> I also want to have a semi-automated way to pull the updates from upstream. 
> What is the preferred scripting language? Is bash (python, perl) ok? 

If it runs on your machine, why asking?

> When pulling a new update, what text do we expect in the ChangeLog? 
> Is the upstream SVN revision enough, or we want to copy all commit messages?

Ideally a script could parse the commit messages on the LLVM side and yield a
GNU-compatible ChangeLog; the granularity could be the file instead of the
function.  That being said, I don't know what LLVM commit messages look like,
so this might not really work.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-20  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-18  4:07 [Bug other/55376] New: " konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-18  5:18 ` [Bug other/55376] " xinliangli at gmail dot com
2012-11-18  9:30 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-18 18:47 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-19 22:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20  5:41 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-20  7:23 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-11-20 10:17 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-21  4:24 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-23 10:57 ` [Bug sanitizer/55376] " konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-23 12:45 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
2012-11-23 12:57 ` konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55376-4-limc4iMAg2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).