[Bug bootstrap/55384] New: [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[Bug bootstrap/55384] New: [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dje at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

             Bug #: 55384
           Summary: [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: dje@gcc.gnu.org


/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c: In function 'c_fileinfo*
get_fileinfo(const char*)':
/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c:107:39: error: overloaded function
with no contextual type information

/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/tree-dump.c: In function 'void dump_node(const_tree,
int, FILE*)':
/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/tree-dump.c:759:39: error: address of overloaded
function with no contextual type information

[Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dje at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-18 22:01:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 28727
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28727
c-lex.c preprocessed

[Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dje at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-11-18
                 CC|                            |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-18 22:03:32 UTC ---
Confirmed.

[Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dje at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-18 22:02:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 28728
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28728
tree-dump.c preprocessed

[Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dje at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |build
             Target|                            |powerpc-ibm-aix*
               Host|                            |powerpc-ibm-aix*
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0
              Build|                            |powerpc-ibm-aix*
           Severity|normal                      |critical

[Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dje at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-19 00:21:59 UTC ---
AIX /usr/include/stdlib.h includes

#define vec_free free

And vec.h defines two functions named vec_free, which get renamed, causing
ambiguity in the splay_tree_new calls. 

Should vec.h #undef vec_free?  Somewhere else?

[Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dnovillo at google dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at google dot com <dnovillo at google dot com> 2012-11-19 01:05:32 UTC ---
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:21 PM, dje at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
>
> --- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-19 00:21:59 UTC ---
> AIX /usr/include/stdlib.h includes
>
> #define vec_free free

Sigh.  Silly AIX.

> And vec.h defines two functions named vec_free, which get renamed, causing
> ambiguity in the splay_tree_new calls.
>
> Should vec.h #undef vec_free?  Somewhere else?

I suppose it will have to how can I recognize AIX inside vec.h?


Diego.

[Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dje at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-19 18:07:35 UTC ---
Author: dje
Date: Mon Nov 19 18:07:21 2012
New Revision: 193629

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193629
Log:
Add PR bootstrap/55384 to ChangeLog entry.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog

[Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure

[dje at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-19 18:15:24 UTC ---
Patch to system.h committed.