From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-407029-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32314 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2012 01:06:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 31856 invoked by uid 55); 19 Nov 2012 01:05:33 -0000
From: "dnovillo at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/55384] [4.8 Regresson] VEC merge AIX bootstrap failure
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: dnovillo at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55384-4-qwFzeNywrr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55384-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55384-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01691.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at google dot com <dnovillo at google dot com> 2012-11-19 01:05:32 UTC ---
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:21 PM, dje at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384
>
> --- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-19 00:21:59 UTC ---
> AIX /usr/include/stdlib.h includes
>
> #define vec_free free

Sigh.  Silly AIX.

> And vec.h defines two functions named vec_free, which get renamed, causing
> ambiguity in the splay_tree_new calls.
>
> Should vec.h #undef vec_free?  Somewhere else?

I suppose it will have to how can I recognize AIX inside vec.h?


Diego.