From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16816 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2012 16:42:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 15345 invoked by uid 48); 4 Dec 2012 16:41:36 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/55395] [4.8 Regression] libgfortran bootstrap failure on powerpc-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00381.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-04 16:41:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > OK, what value it should be? We always used error_mark_node with this meaning > both in LTO and cgraph. Dunno, I'm leaning towards just not dropping anything for -g. > static int a[]={huge sequence of numbers}; > In C++ we have a lot of class constructors and vtables that comes from headers > and can go away... But that should be perfectly expressable in DWARF4, if we don't express it right now, we just should.