From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10915 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2012 03:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 10808 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2012 03:14:04 -0000 From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55426] gcc.target/arm/neon-vld1_dupQ.c ICEs on armeb Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02656.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55426 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-11-28 03:14:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Reverting the definition of CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS introduced on 2012-10-22 > > at rev #192687 avoids the ICE too. > > I have tried this, reverting the revision #192687 would fix this issue. But as > the comment of the patch specifies > "In big-endian mode, modes greater than word size (i.e. DFmode) are stored in > VFP registers in little-endian order. We can't describe that accurately to > GCC, so avoid taking subregs of such values.". > > Reverting the patch would adversely affect the big-endian toolchain. Hence, I > assume that we should have an alternate fix. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Reverting the definition of CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS introduced on 2012-10-22 > > at rev #192687 avoids the ICE too. > > I have tried this, reverting the revision #192687 would fix this issue. But as > the comment of the patch specifies > "In big-endian mode, modes greater than word size (i.e. DFmode) are stored in > VFP registers in little-endian order. We can't describe that accurately to > GCC, so avoid taking subregs of such values.". > > Reverting the patch would adversely affect the big-endian toolchain. Hence, I > assume that we should have an alternate fix. We do have w-w moves in vfp.md *movdi_vfp and friends. why doesn't that work for you ? Ramana