From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-407879-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25219 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2012 15:51:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 25161 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2012 15:50:44 -0000
From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/55489] [4.7/4.8 regression] insane PRE memory usage with PIE (translate.i)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bonzini at gnu dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Known to work Summary Known to fail
Message-ID: <bug-55489-4-Ki9sptNl98@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55489-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55489-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02541.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55489

Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|4.8.0                       |
            Summary|[4.7 regression] insane PRE |[4.7/4.8 regression] insane
                   |memory usage with PIE       |PRE memory usage with PIE
                   |(translate.i)               |(translate.i)
      Known to fail|                            |4.8.0

--- Comment #1 from Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org> 2012-11-27 15:50:44 UTC ---
Strictly not a regression, because the underlying bug is present since always. 
But something between 4.4.6 and 4.7.2 caused memory usage to become much worse.

Also, marking it as not-working in 4.8 because the allocation of
reg_known_value is wrong:

  vec_alloc (reg_known_value, maxreg - FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER);

and that's what causes the bug to be latent: set_reg_known_value becomes a
no-op, and get_reg_known_value always returns NULL.