public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "yvan.roux at linaro dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/55492] New: __atomic_load doesn't match ACQUIRE memory model
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55492

             Bug #: 55492
           Summary: __atomic_load doesn't match ACQUIRE memory model
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: yvan.roux@linaro.org


Created attachment 28796
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28796
Generic expansion patch proposal

Compiling this code for ARMv7

int v;

int foo()
{
  return __atomic_load_n (&v, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
}

generates a data memory barrier defore the load:

foo:
    movw    r3, #:lower16:v
    movt    r3, #:upper16:v
    dmb     sy
    ldr     r0, [r3, #0]
    bx      lr

But, the `Acquire’ semantics imply that no reads in the current thread
dependent on the value currently loaded can be reordered before this load.
Thus, the barrier needs to be after the load and not before.

The issue seems to be in expand_atomic_load which put a memory fence before
the load in any memory model. The attached patch fixes the problem.


             reply	other threads:[~2012-11-27 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-27 16:13 yvan.roux at linaro dot org [this message]
2012-11-28 20:06 ` [Bug target/55492] " amacleod at redhat dot com
2012-11-29  9:51 ` yvan.roux at linaro dot org
2012-11-29 15:20 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2012-12-13 21:01 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-13 21:17 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-13 21:18 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-13 21:19 ` [Bug middle-end/55492] " rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-14 10:14 ` yvan.roux at linaro dot org
2012-12-14 15:33 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2012-12-14 16:29 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).