From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16816 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2012 14:10:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 16585 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2012 14:10:25 -0000 From: "krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/55511] [4.8 Regression] r193802 caused s390x bootstrap failure Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02735.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55511 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-11-28 14:10:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Is this with the first build of libgcc? I.e. is it likely that I'll > > see this with just a cross-build? > > > > Also, can you please check whether the patch in > > solves the problem, > > as it does for alpha-linux? > > I'll reply myself: apparently-yes, yes and yes; cross from x86_86-linux. > And need to add "-fpreprocessed" to the cc1 command-line above or there's an > unhelpful preprocessor error. So, once Jakub has committed that patch, please > verify that this is sufficient (besides required). Thanks. Native build is finished as well. Jakub's patch fixes the issue.