From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6042 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2012 18:24:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 5944 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2012 18:23:46 -0000 From: "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55518] boehm-gc, libatomic, libffi and libgomp testsuite can't find path to libasan for make check with -fsanitizer Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02770.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-28 18:23:45 UTC --- Considering that H.J. is working towards a --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan option, it would seem wise to allow for testing the existing FSF gcc testsuite against libasan without folks having to really hack up their source tree to do so. Wasn't libsanitizer added to vet the code generation of FSF gcc? That would place it in a slightly different category than say --fopenmp or -fgnu-tm.