From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24495 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2012 01:41:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 24447 invoked by uid 48); 30 Nov 2012 01:41:14 -0000 From: "luto at mit dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55522] -funsafe-math-optimizations is unexpectedly harmful, especially w/ -shared Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: luto at mit dot edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02956.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522 --- Comment #3 from Andy Lutomirski 2012-11-30 01:41:14 UTC --- I'm still unconvinced that it makes sense as part of -funsafe-math-optimizations at all. It's not an "optimization" in the sense that people usually think of when looking at compiler flags.