From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1244 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2012 09:30:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 1108 invoked by uid 48); 2 Dec 2012 09:30:19 -0000 From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN crashes for Fortran Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 Joost VandeVondele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Joost.VandeVondele at mat | |dot ethz.ch --- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-12-02 09:30:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Note that ThreadSanitizer does not understand Fortran/OpenMP synchronization, > so most likely it won't be useful anyway. I was assuming that it would do just fine, as OMP in gcc is just built on pthreads ? I believe that Fortran and C are relatively similar from a middle-end perspective.