From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-408674-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17107 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2012 18:48:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 17011 invoked by uid 48); 3 Dec 2012 18:48:11 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55577] g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C failures
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55577-4-TxknSNJecm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55577

--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-03 18:48:08 UTC ---
> Everybody has them, I've said in the mail containing the patch that there are a
> few unanalyzed failures, and what the reasons for some of those failures are
> (e.g. not instrumenting bitfields yet).

Ah, sorry.  You can XFAIL them in the meantime though, adding testcases that
don't pass is a bit weird in my opinion.