From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20264 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2012 00:31:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 20199 invoked by uid 48); 9 Dec 2012 00:31:41 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/55578] Disabling warnings inside macro definition doesn't work Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 00:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00802.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55578 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-12-09 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-09 00:31:40 UTC --- Confirmed. It only happens with the C++ front-end though. The exact same code does not warn with the C front-end. I think this might be the pre-ahead of time tokenizer that happens for the C++ front-end but does not happen for C.