From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-418859-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16183 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2013 13:45:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16065 invoked by uid 48); 1 Apr 2013 13:45:36 -0000
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/55583] Extended shift instruction on x86-64 is not used, producing unoptimal code
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55583-4-PSkbzFEE8M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55583

--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-01 13:45:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 29764
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29764
Patch from comment #4

I apparently forgot to attach a patch when I posted comment #4. This is just to
show the idea, it doesn't handle many cases, and the length_immediate value was
randomly filled just to let it compile.