From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-408877-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20443 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2012 17:56:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 20402 invoked by uid 48); 5 Dec 2012 17:55:52 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55597-4-I89iGb42SO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55597-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55597-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00485.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597

--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2012-12-05 17:55:51 UTC ---
Does this patch

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index a24e407..b496490 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -12802,6 +12802,8 @@ legitimize_tls_address (rtx x, enum tls_model model,
bool for_mov)
           end_sequence ();

           RTL_CONST_CALL_P (insns) = 1;
+          if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
+        x = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, x);
           emit_libcall_block (insns, dest, rax, x);
         }
       else

make any senses?