public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/55608] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Debug info quality regressions with file scope vars
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55608-4-WhbRPVGAL6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55608-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-12-06
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-06 09:05:12 UTC ---
One might argue that not including unused static(!) const vars that might come
from headers in all TUs is a good thing - for debug info size, for example.
Definitely debug info is already way too large - and we don't include
optimized out functions either (so you cannot do inferior calls to them
from the debugging session).  I don't really see the difference between
functions and variables here.  Functions even don't print <optimized out>
but just

(gdb) start
Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x4004c4: file t.c, line 5.
Starting program: /tmp/t 

Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at t.c:5
5       }
(gdb) p foo
No symbol "foo" in current context.
(gdb) p foo ()
No symbol "foo" in current context.


testcase:

static int foo (void) { return 1; }
int main()
{
  return 0;
}


at least can we emit this info on unused stuff with -g3 only?


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-06  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-06  8:58 [Bug debug/55608] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-06  9:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-12-06  9:12 ` [Bug debug/55608] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-06  9:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-06 14:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-11 10:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-11 15:56 ` [Bug debug/55608] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-21 20:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-04 11:39 ` [Bug debug/55608] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55608-4-WhbRPVGAL6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).